18 Search Results

Not provided.

Simulations of a transient stratified sodium experiment are carried out using a classic unsteady RANS model and the second-generation URANS model, STRUCT-ε. Turbulence modeling challenges and their implications to stratified flow prediction are discussed in the context of other sources of error. Input errors are discussed and addressed; discretization error is calculated to be less than 5% of the inlet velocity, for 80% of the domain; and remaining errors in temperature distributions are attributed to the turbulence model. Qualitative flow features from the simulations are presented and discussed. Compared to the experiment, the STRUCT-ε turbulence model provides a more physicallymore » accurate prediction of temperature and momentum mixing in key regions of the domain. Quantitative measures such as the L₂ norm of the temperature discrepancy demonstrate the improved performance of the STRUCT-ε approach. In conclusion, the magnitude of the temperature fluctuations is very well-predicted by the STRUCT-ε, while URANS overpredicts them by approximately 50%.« less

Recently, a Eulerian-based two-fluid computational fluid dynamics (CFD) framework with a wall heat flux partitioning approach has been intensively investigated for departure from nucleate boiling (DNB) simulation under the U.S. Department of Energy–funded Consortium for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors (CASL) program. Understanding of the DNB characteristics over a range of pressurized water reactor–like operating conditions and accurate prediction of boiling crisis in the nuclear power system have been grand challenges because of the large impact of DNB on reactor safety and operational economics. The ultimate goal of this task in the CASL program is to introduce a robustmore » multiphase CFD–based DNB modeling framework that is capable of characterizing an entire boiling history in which the wall boiling mode experiences the following through multiple stages of heat transfer mode: (1) single-phase convective heat transfer, (2) nucleate boiling heat transfer, and (3) identification of the departure of nucleate boiling. To validate the CASL boiling model, we have benchmarked simulated DNB over three different flow channel configurations (pipe flow, 5 × 5 fuel bundle with mixing vane tests, and 5 × 5 fuel bundle without mixing vane tests) against experimental measurements, and the validation result with open literature is reported. The DNB detection criteria in the simulation are checked by monitoring the peak wall temperature, wall dryout factor, and net energy balance. In addition to the DNB performance test, some preliminary sensitivity results on closure model selection are reported to address the prediction capability of local void profile against measurements. The boiling simulation tested in this study exhibits a maximum deviation of 24% from the measured DNB value in a high-pressure (i.e., 138 bars) subcooled pipe flow test. The ranges of operating conditions are as follows: 1650 to 2650 kg/m²·s for mass flux and 8.5 to 96 K for subcooled inlet temperature. The deviation is even reduced to 7% when the subcooled temperature is less than 40 K. Besides accuracy, base practice guidelines for DNB detection criteria are tested by monitoring three simulation variables: (1) maximum wall temperature, (2) wall dryout factor (i.e., K-value), and (3) energy balance. Numerical robustness of DNB simulation is largely achieved in most of the validation test except for a few high subcooled test cases.« less